Benchmark vs. interpolated elevations

Discuss general site topics

Benchmark vs. interpolated elevations

Postby Scott Patterson » Fri Sep 11, 2020 10:03 pm

I'm just curious about this one.

If a benchmark doesn't show up on the 7.5 minute maps, but has a marked elevation, would it be best to use the benchmark elevation vs. the interpolated one?

Take this summit for example:

https://listsofjohn.com/peak/6582

Benchmark:

28121.jpg
28121.jpg (88.17 KiB) Viewed 68 times


I'm just curious, rather than debating. Personally I would use the benchmark elevation, but it wouldn't matter much either way for a peak such as this since it would be tanked either way.
Scott Patterson
 
Posts: 121
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 2:58 pm

Re: Benchmark vs. interpolated elevations

Postby TeresaGergen » Sat Sep 12, 2020 8:28 am

I won't offer an opinion about your actual question, but I'll note that in general changing the elevation of a ranked peak can, in fact, matter to where it falls on elevation-oriented lists, which can affect if peaks move in or out of lists (highest hundred group cutoffs, or even potentially boundaries between 5ers, 6ers, etc.) This has happened on LOJ in the past for various reasons when elevations are found to be inaccurate.
TeresaGergen
 
Posts: 172
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 1:55 pm

Re: Benchmark vs. interpolated elevations

Postby John Kirk » Tue Sep 22, 2020 10:11 am

I'd say it makes sense when the stamped elevation is not contradictory, rather it is complimentary (within range of the map contours). In this case it contradicts the contour interval it is found in (5680+40').
User avatar
John Kirk
LoJ Architect
 
Posts: 1590
Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 1:04 am
Location: Lakewood, CO


Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests