Forum of Lists

Posted: **Tue Jan 23, 2007 8:06 pm**

Looks like the summit of San Bernardo Mountain on the Mt. Wilson quad should actually be 11,900, not 11,861. There is a small 11,880-foot contour just south of the 11,861-foot point. This gives it an interpolated prominence of 1,000 feet, so it should be added to that list as well.

http://www.topozone.com/map.asp?lat=37.84625&lon=-107.90843&datum=nad83&u=4&layer=DRG&size=l&s=25

Posted: **Tue Jan 23, 2007 10:27 pm**

Nice find Kirk! Agree on the interpolated elevation of 11900' and interpolated prominence of 1000'.

Posted: **Wed Jan 24, 2007 12:13 pm**

Thanks Kirk - the site has been updated.

Posted: **Wed Jan 24, 2007 1:43 pm**

Good job, Kirk, thanks!

Posted: **Thu Jan 25, 2007 10:03 pm**

Hate to spoil the fun but...

When I climbed San Bernardo, I visited the 11861, 11900 and 11822 hi pts.
turns out that 11861 is the high point.

Mike G

Posted: **Fri Jan 26, 2007 11:29 am**

First it's Mesa de Maya, now this - you're a real killjoy Mike. :tongue:

Did you level it?

Posted: **Fri Jan 26, 2007 5:22 pm**

No need to level it.
It was in plain sight for any fool to see.
:shock:

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2007 11:42 am**

Sorry to create extra work. But I guess it's good to know that there is a clear map error on this.

Posted: **Mon Jan 29, 2007 6:57 pm**

kirkmallory wrote:Sorry to create extra work. But I guess it's good to know that there is a clear map error on this.

No problem Kirk - that's what makes the list more robust. I've actually added a column in the database for field notes (seen on profiles):

http://www.listsofjohn.com/PeakStats/Climbers.php?Id=1849

I'll have to start looking through my old email to put in notes for other peaks.

Posted: **Wed Jan 31, 2007 10:59 am**

That's a good idea. I know Gerry has several notes about 12ers & 13ers on his Project Island site - maybe you could start there.

Maybe we could also add in unresolved issues, like Lavender vs. Hespersus, or the issue of which of the Nokhu Crags is higher.