Problem with AZ climbed peaks list

[BrianR]

John,

When I look at the peaks climbed for a person for AZ, UT, and perhaps other states (I didn't check them all), the order of the peaks is a weird pattern that starts out with some peaks in prominence order, then settles into elevation order instead of all being in strictly elevation order, e.g.
http://listsofjohn.com/PeakStats/statea ... rianR&s=AZ
It's easy to see with mine since most of my AZ peaks are low prominence, but seems to be the case for everyone. Same for UT, but I don't have any peaks there.

[JoeGrim]

From first glance, it looks like they're ordered by their ID number.

[BrianR]

Good point and that makes sense since high prom peaks were available for all states before the P300 lists were complete.

[John Kirk]

Thanks - I never noticed I neglected to add the sort. It is sorted by descending elevation, then prominence (where elevations are tied) now.

[BrianR]

Thanks John, looks great now.